World of Warcraft - US

World of Warcraft - US
Plaintiff’s argument is that by devaluing gold, spamming chat, camping spawns, and generally disrupting gameplay, IGE has broken its agreement with Blizzard and injured all other World of Warcraft players — the “intended beneficiaries.Here, the argument is over whether the clause requiring arbitration should apply to this kind of third-party beneficiary action. Because this case involves a relatively unconventional use of the third party beneficiary doctrine

World of Warcraft - US Power Leveling
there is no case law directly on point. As a result, the parties are arguing somewhat differently than they would in a typical argument over an arbitration clause and that should be true here too. Hernandez argues that the impact of the application of this clause in this situation would be to deny any possibility of a class-based claim against another player, because class-based arbitrations are prohibited by the clause.

World of Warcraft - US Buy Account / Sell Account
As always when reviewing excerpts from court filings on VB, keep in mind that a brief is an advocacy document, and thus intentionally slanted in favor of the party that files it (here, Hernandez). Here are a few key excerpts

More Details...